THE NUMBER OF SHREWS AND STRUCTURE OF THEIR COMMUNITIES IN THE INFLUENCE ZONE OF THE NIZHNEBUREYSKOYE RESERVOIR

Authors

  • I. M. Cheremkin Blagoveshchensk State Pedagogical University
  • V. A. Nesterenko Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity FEB RAS
  • R. N. Podol’ko Blagoveshchensk State Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/1999-4079-2018-10-3-4-180-189

Keywords:

shrews, community, dominance structure, reservoir, habitat transformation

Abstract

The construction of hydroelectric power plants is accompanied by a large-scale landscape transformation and environmental changes, caused by the fact that the dynamics of the natural processes in the vicinity of the reservoirs is determined by regime of artificial maintaining of the water level. In order to clarify the impact of anthropogenic habitat disturbance on small mammals, in August 2015-2018, studies were conducted in the vicinity of the newly formed Nizhnebureyskoye reservoir located on the Bureya River in the Amur Region. At the previous stage of flooding, monitoring stations were set at two sites in the zone of direct and indirect impact of the reservoir on the right and left banks and one site below the dam. Six shrew species were caught, of which common ones are Laxmann’s shrew S. caecutiens, flat-skulled shrew S. roboratus, largetoothed shrew S. daphaenodon and even-toothed shrew S. isodon, and secondary ones are Eurasian least shrew S. minutissimus and tundra shrew S. tundrensis. It was found and confirmed by a comparative analysis of diversity indices that at each monitoring site the entire population of shrews forms a unified community represented by a continuum of local groups related to the gradient of the habitat type. Before the reservoir was filled, all shrew communities were characterized by a monodominant type of structure with absolute predomination of S. caecutiens with participation in samplings more than 50% and maximum abundance of 14.5 ind./100 cone-days. Shrew communities consist of representatives of different faunal groups that differently react to environmental change. As a result not only participation of different species change but it is also possible the transition of secondary species to the rank of subdominants and even replacement of dominant species. As an indicator of the changes taking place, it is proposed to use the dominance structure in shrew community with the identification of trends in its dynamics.

References

Бромлей Г.Ф., Костенко В.А., Николаев И.Г., Охотина М.В., Юдин В.Г., Братенков П.В., 1984. Млекопитающие Зейского заповедника. Владивосток: ДВНЦ АН СССР. 142 с.

Гашев С.Н., 2000. Млекопитающие в системе экологического мониторинга (на примере Тюменской области). Тюмень: Издательство ТГУ. 220 с.

Зайцев В.А. Позвоночные животные северо-востока Центрального региона России (виды фауны, численность и ее изменения). М.: Товарищество научных изданий КМК, 2006. 522 с.

Исиченко Б.Н., 2012. Нижне-Бурейская ГЭС // Гидротехническое строительство. № 8. С. 26-27.

Калецкая М.Л., 1953. Фауна млекопитающих Дарвинского заповедника и ее изменение под влиянием водохранилища // Рыбинское водохранилище. М.: Изд-во МОИП. Ч. 1. С. 95-121.

Колобаев Н.Н., Подольский С.А., Дарман Ю.А., 2000. Влияние Зейского водохранилища на наземных позвоночных (амфибии, рептилии, млекопитающие). Благовещенск. 216 с.

Лукьянова Л.Е., Лукьянов О.А., 1998. Реакция сообществ и популяций мелких млекопитающих на техногенные воздействия. I. Сообщества // Успехи современной биологии. Т. 118. № 5. С. 613-622.

Лукьянова Л.Е., Пястолова О.А., Лукьянов О.А., Микшевич Н.В., 1990. Изучение популяций мелких млекопитающих в условиях техногенного воздействия // Экология. № 2. С. 53–61.

Нестеренко В.А., 1999. Насекомоядные юга Дальнего Востока и их сообщества. Владивосток: Дальнаука. 172 с.

Павлова К.П., 2010. Редкие виды бурозубок (Soricomorpha: Sorex) Зейского заповедника // Амурский зоологический журнал. Т. 2. № 1. С. 90-91.

Пожидаева Н.В., 2013. Особенности формирования фауны мелких млекопитающих северного побережья Рыбинского водохранилища (на примере Дарвинского заповедника) // Поволжский экологический журнал. № 3. С. 304–315.

Рыбинское водохранилище, 1953. Изменение природы побережий водохранилища. Ч. 1. / Под ред. Ю.А. Исакова. М.: Изд-во МОИП. 214 с.

Юдин Б.С., 1989. Насекомоядные млекопитающие Сибири. Новосибирск: Наука. 360 c.

Haydon D., Steen H., 1997. The effect of large- and small-scale random events on the synchrony of metapopulation dynamics: a theoretical analysis // Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences. V. 264. P. 1375-1381.

Krebs C.J., Kenney A.J., Gilbert S., Danell K., Angerbjorn A., Erlinge S., Bromley R., Shank C., Carriere S., 2002. Synchrony in lemmings and voles populations in the Canadian Arctic // Can. J. Zool. V. 80, No. 8. P. 1323-1330.

Liebhold A., Koenig W.D., Bjornstad O.N., 2004. Spatial synchrony in population dynamics // Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. V. 35. P. 467-490.

Nesterenko V.A., Loktionova E.Yu., Burkovsky O.A., 2016. Dynamics of structure of shrew taxocene in Southern Sakhalin // Contemporary Problems of Ecology. No. 3. С. 333-342 .

Okhotina M.V., 1977. Palaearctic shrews of the subgenus Otisorex // Acta Theriologica. V. 22. No. 11. P. 191-206.

Ripa J., 2000. Analyzing the Moran effect and dispersal: their significance and interaction in synchronous population dynamics // Oikos. V. 8. No. 1. P. 175-187.

Published

2018-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles